Papers with LLM agents

13 papers
LongSpec: Long-Context Lossless Speculative Decoding with Efficient Drafting and Verification (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) can process extremely long contexts, requiring efficient inference over extended inputs.
Approach: They propose a model that uses a constant-sized key-value cache to train long-context models.
Outcome: Experimental results show that LongSpec achieves 3.26x speedup over strong Flash Attention baselines and 2.34x wall clock time on four math reasoning tasks.
Beyond Blind Following: Evaluating Robustness of LLM Agents under Imperfect Guidance (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities as task-solving agents across interactive domains, but in complex environments, auxiliary guidance may be imperfect.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to measure the robustness of large language models under imperfect guidance.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark compared LLM agents in navigation, cooking, and gaming in a variety of environments with auxiliary guidance and noisy or underspecified instructions extracted from demonstrations.
No More Stale Feedback: Co-Evolving Critics for Open-World Agent Learning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current methods for training Large Language Model agents rely on static or offline critic models, which fail to adapt as the policy evolves.
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates a critique and a policy to optimize the policy and critic through a synchronized co-evolutionary loop.
Outcome: The proposed framework yields more stable training and higher long-horizon task success across open-world environments.
RealSafe: Quantifying Safety Risks of Language Agents in Real-World (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have attracted much attention in Artificial Intelligence.
Approach: They propose a framework to rigorously assess the safety and reliability of large language model (LLM) agents in real application scenarios.
Outcome: The framework evaluates the safety and reliability of large language model (LLM) agents in 14 different application scenarios utilizing three contexts - standard operations, ambiguous interactions, and malicious behaviors.
Planning with Multi-Constraints via Collaborative Language Agents (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in neural language models have sparked a new surge of intelligent agent research.
Approach: They propose a method for collaborative LLM-based multi-agent systems that simplifies complex task planning with constraints by decomposing it into a hierarchy of subordinate tasks.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves an average success rate of 42.68% on two constraint-intensive benchmarks, TravelPlanner and API-Bank.
Contextual Experience Replay for Self-Improvement of Language Agents (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing large language model (LLM) agents fail in complex tasks without any environment-specific experiences.
Approach: They propose a framework that accumulates and synthesizes past experiences into a dynamic memory buffer to enable efficient self-improvement for language agents in their context window.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves performance on WebArena and VisualWebAren . it surpasses tree search method with fewer token costs and achieves state-of-the-art performance of 31.9%.
PGPO: Enhancing Agent Reasoning via Pseudocode-style Planning Guided Preference Optimization (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing LLM agents generate verbose and inefficient natural language plans to guide reasoning, which restricts agents’ ability to generalize across similar tasks.
Approach: They propose a pseudocode-style planning guide optimization method that captures the structural logic of reasoning and uses two planning-oriented rewards to enhance agent learning.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing LLM agents on representative agent benchmarks and outperformed the current leading baselines.
CAR: Empowering Agents with Dynamic Tool Synthesis and Global Trajectory Rectification (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing LLM agents are brittle in open-ended environments due to two limitations: 1) a closed action space; 2) myopic error recovery.
Approach: They propose a novel architecture that augments the action space and revises global strategies by adding a reflective replanning mechanism to the system.
Outcome: Experiments show that CAR outperforms baselines in a diagnostic benchmark with pruned toolsets to simulate tool scarcity.
Consolidation or Adaptation? PRISM: Disentangling SFT and RL Data via Gradient Concentration (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing data arbitration strategies for large language model training rely on surface-level heuristics that fail to diagnose intrinsic learning needs.
Approach: They propose a framework that arbitrates data based on its degree of cognitive conflict with the model's existing knowledge.
Outcome: Extensive experiments on WebShop and ALFWorld show that PRISM outperforms state-of-the-art hybrid methods while reducing computational costs by up to 3.22 .
Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instruction (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Despite their impressive capabilities, LLMs struggle with complex computations and delivering accurate, timely information.
Approach: They propose a framework that prompts LLM agents to ask questions when they encounter obstacles due to unclear instructions and an automated evaluation tool called ToolEvaluator.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing frameworks for tool learning in the Noisy ToolBench.
PersonaAgent: Bridging Memory and Action for Personalized LLM Agents (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing Large Language Model (LLM) enabled agents lack flexibility to respond to users’ varying needs and preferences.
Approach: They propose a test-time user-preference alignment strategy that optimizes the persona prompt, ensuring real-time preference alignment through textual loss feedback between simulated and ground-truth responses.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms baseline methods in real-time and in real applications.
PEARL: Self-Evolving Assistant for Time Management with Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Scheduling logistics associated with meetings can amount to hours each week . a lack of automation can cause a lot of errors and can be costly .
Approach: They propose a benchmark for long-horizon calendar conflict resolution that automates calendar conflict management . they propose 'pearl' that augments the language agent with an external preference memory .
Outcome: a new benchmark for long-horizon calendar conflict resolution shows that existing agents perform poorly with high error rates.
InfiAgent: An Infinite-Horizon Framework for General-Purpose Autonomous Agents (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing LLMs break down on long-horizon tasks due to unbounded context growth and accumulated errors.
Approach: They propose a framework that externalizes persistent state into a file-centric state abstraction and keeps the agent’s reasoning context strictly bounded regardless of task duration.
Outcome: Experiments on DeepResearch and an 80-paper literature review show that the proposed framework maintains higher long-horizon coverage than baseline models without task-specific fine-tuning.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations